Edo 2024: Significance of Political Debate in Building Public Trust and Confidence
By Rita Ebiuwa
In a notable development in the upcoming electoral race, the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) and its candidate have announced their decision not to participate in the ITV debate if other candidates are not present. This decision underscores a significant issue in the current debate format: the use of spokespersons in place of the actual candidates.
The core of the PDP’s stance is that debates should involve direct interaction between candidates themselves. The concept of having spokespersons represent candidates in these debates is deemed unacceptable. Effective debates require a direct exchange of ideas, policies, and responses between the candidates, not through their representatives. Debating with spokespersons rather than the candidates themselves undermines the integrity and effectiveness of the discourse.
The absence of the APC candidate from public debates is particularly troubling. For someone aspiring to lead a state, the reluctance to engage in such crucial discussions raises questions about their readiness and commitment. The APC candidate’s avoidance of the debate remains a mystery and could signal a lack of confidence or preparedness for the responsibilities of governance.
The PDP is calling on APC candidate Monday Okpebholo to step forward and participate in the debate. It is imperative for Okpebholo to present his vision, plans, and qualifications to the people of Edo. This debate represents a crucial opportunity for voters to gauge the suitability of each candidate for the role of governor.
Should the other candidates agree to participate in the debate today, Asue Ighodalo, the PDP candidate, is fully prepared and enthusiastic about the opportunity. Ighodalo’s readiness and commitment to engaging in a meaningful dialogue highlight his preparedness for the role and his willingness to address the key issues facing Edo.
In conclusion, the PDP’s decision reflects a call for a more transparent and direct electoral debate process, ensuring that voters can make informed decisions based on candid interactions with the actual candidates.
